“There’s nothing on that website that Fred didn’t say himself in the boston.com article.”
Another excuse.
“Settle down, sparky. So why did I ping you to another thread where I was accused of cheerleading FOR Thompson?”
I doubt that.
“He supports more of the GOP platform than most other candidates. If he’s a RINO it’s only because the GOP has moved left.”
Another excuse.
“See, you yourself don’t know that I have only defended Paul, because you haven’t looked at my other posts.”
I have looked at what you have spewed on here, hence the determination that you’re not worth the effort.
“I guess that makes you a two-faced hypocrite?”
I’d have to be a ron paul supporter to be one.
“Pot, meet kettle.”
Only if you’re looking at yourself in the mirror.
“Another excuse.”
Excuse for what?
What a silly comment.
Is this what passes for an argument, in your mind?
Like I said - ignore everything else and focus on what Campaign FRed Reform said about his representing Aristide for free on boston.com.
Mr: “Settle down, sparky. So why did I ping you to another thread where I was accused of cheerleading FOR Thompson?”
You: “I doubt that.”
You RESPONDED to the post, lol, but with a red herring response.
Here’ is where I pinged you to my response to being accused of cheerleading for fred.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1952454/posts?page=9#9
“I have looked at what you have spewed on here, hence the determination that you’re not worth the effort.”
Unlikely, or I wouldn’t have had to ping you to that post, again. ;)
I still haven’t seen you admit you were mistaken on this one
How about it? Be magnanimous.
Mr: “Settle down, sparky. So why did I ping you to another thread where I was accused of cheerleading FOR Thompson?”
You: “I doubt that.”
You RESPONDED to the post, lol, but with a red herring response.
Here’ is where I pinged you to my response to being accused of cheerleading for fred.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1952454/posts?page=9#9