Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: papasmurf

“1. If the AF is “politically jousting”, do they not run the risk of the Pentagon, driven by the bean counters, pushing up and expanding, the various UCAV programs?”

IMO this is a response to those bean counters who are already challenging the need for manned fighters.

What is the Pentagon composed of? Its compoed of officers from each of the branches. While it is political it is no more so than the various branches of the armed forces when it comes to these kinds of acquisitions.


61 posted on 01/11/2008 8:28:47 AM PST by driftdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: driftdiver
BTW, to expand on my #62: I'm not a fighter pilot, or an aeronautical engineer. Fighters are outside my professional expertise.

So, maybe we haven't yet reached the "better replace 'em now or we're screwed" point with the early F15s.

Maybe.

I wouldn't know for sure.

But when one disintegrates during routine operations, because a major structural part catastrophically failed due to being worn out, and the entire fleet gets grounded for weeks, you gotta start asking questions.

And yes, a real solution will cost a lot more than the next band-aid. It's always that way.

Sometimes, you can't afford NOT to go for the real solution.

68 posted on 01/11/2008 8:44:19 AM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson