Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RightWhale; xcamel; neverdem
You get a very, very different “result” from a sine wave: Even a second-order or third order curve evokes a very different result.

But a flat line? No. That’s NOT the way to fit this kind of data.

A “simple sloped line? Like they tried here?
Again: It ONLY fits their scenario of a constantly (or accelerating!) temp increase. The AGW extremists CAN’T afford (literally!) to allow any other answer to be seen.

27 posted on 01/11/2008 10:58:28 AM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Robert A. Cook, PE

Sorry, we don’t do parabolas or other conics here. We were issued only these straightedges. Least squares or forget it.


28 posted on 01/11/2008 11:02:18 AM PST by RightWhale (Dean Koonz is good, but my favorite authors are Dun and Bradstreet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson