Please ping me if you get a response because the manmade link is the important part; logic and hard numbers are rare with this topic. The NYTimes readers responding at the end of this piece felt the graphic vindicated the IPCC's predictions. This proves that the NYTimes is good at selling newspapers, and whether they're talking cooling or warming, it's the sun and not CO2 (manmade or natural) that relates to the anomaly.
Further, a KNOWN increase in CO2 of over 10% (from 1996 through 2008!) has NOT meant any detectable increase in temperatures!
At stations in the southern hemisphere (with an opposite winter-summer growing period) the same slight CO2 oscillation happens, but in the reversed months.
What has ONLY happened in the 1972-1998 period is a increase in CO2 with an increase in temperatures: at EVERY other period since 1890’s, temperatures have NOT tracked with CO2: temp’s go up, CO2 remains the same; temps go down, CO2 increases; CO2 increases, temps stay the same.
Pick ANY 27 year period since the 1990’s, and the CO2-temperature relationship can be ANYTHING you want it to be.
Comment# 29 has a graph of CO2 versus time.