Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Presidential candidate would freeze government hiring (Fred Thompson)
Federal Computer Worker ^ | January 10, 2008 | Wade-Hahn Chan

Posted on 01/10/2008 12:24:13 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

Republican presidential hopeful Fred Thompson wants to curb government spending by halting federal hiring.

If elected, Thompson said, he would stop government agencies from acquiring new personnel for one year and his administration would perform senior-level assessments of agency priorities.

“This will give a new administration time to assess its personnel requirements in order to ‘right size’ the federal workforce,” according to a statement posted earlier this week on Thompson’s campaign Web site.

Two other candidates have promised to reshape the federal workforce. Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani said he would not rehire half the positions that will be vacated after the baby boomer retirement wave hits in the next three years. Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.) said she would cut half a million contractors.

Thompson also promised to conduct a cost-benefit analysis of all federal programs in an effort to defund, combine or probate underperforming projects. The issue was spurred by the results of the Office of Management and Budget’s Program Assessment Rating Tool, which found many government programs moderately effective or ineffective.

The Bush administration responded similarly to PART results, eventually issuing an executive order Nov. 13 requiring all agencies to select performance improvement officers to be part of a Performance Improvement Council. The council will be charged with standardizing evaluation criteria, monitoring performance assessments and making policy recommendations.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bureaucracy; civilservants; costsavings; cutbacks; election; electionpresident; elections; fredthompson; gop; governmentemployees; lowertaxes; republicans; sc2008; spending; taxes; waste; wlwctions
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
One more good reason to vote for Fred!
1 posted on 01/10/2008 12:24:15 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

So far, one of the few candidates we see measurable, specific plans form.


2 posted on 01/10/2008 12:27:06 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

That’s also a page from the Reagan playbook ... one of the first things he did in office, AFTER cutting the IRS staff by a third.


3 posted on 01/10/2008 12:27:56 PM PST by Dr. Sivana (Not a newbie, I just wanted a new screen name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

Fred is the real deal. He states what he stands for!


4 posted on 01/10/2008 12:28:06 PM PST by rocksblues (Just enforce the law!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

AGREED! Yet the lemmings in the Repub party continue to break for Huckalame. WHY?!?


5 posted on 01/10/2008 12:29:43 PM PST by steel_resolve (If you can't stand behind our troops, then please stand in front...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The first step should be to fire all of the holdovers from the ‘Toon administration.


6 posted on 01/10/2008 12:32:21 PM PST by Natty Bumppo@frontier.net (The facts of life are conservative -- Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Go Fred go!!!

Get on the Fred express!!

Notice how the only criticisms that conservatives can come up with for Fred is the tired old media line that he’s lazy? No one can rip him on his conservative credentials or plans except for supporting the anti first amendment bill otherwise known as McCain/Fiengold. Of which he has already apologized for and said it was wrong.


8 posted on 01/10/2008 12:34:29 PM PST by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

I sure like this idea! He has a good tax plan too. He needs to get the word out asap.


9 posted on 01/10/2008 12:34:39 PM PST by mtnwmn (mtnwmn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: steel_resolve
WHY?!?

Because Iowa and NH allow independents to vote in the primary. As Rush says independents = Democrats that are unhappy with their own party but still pull the D lever when their vote really counts.

10 posted on 01/10/2008 12:35:05 PM PST by rocksblues (Just enforce the law!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: steel_resolve

God told them? //sarc


11 posted on 01/10/2008 12:35:40 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rocksblues

Rush laid out a scenario that scared me for our nation today on his broadcast....the Huckabee/McCain alliance.


12 posted on 01/10/2008 12:38:04 PM PST by mtnwmn (mtnwmn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Beginning with himself.

Go Mr. 1%!


13 posted on 01/10/2008 12:38:11 PM PST by rubeng
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rocksblues
Because Iowa and NH allow independents to vote in the primary.

Iowa does not. But even amoung self-professed "strong conservatives", Fred trails McCain, Huck and Romney. This shows that voters are buying the B.S. that these three are slinging. Fred neets to educate these people, FAST!

14 posted on 01/10/2008 12:39:23 PM PST by Texas Federalist (Taxes get so depressed when they hear Fred Thompson is in charge that they cut themselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rocksblues
Because Iowa and NH allow independents to vote in the primary.

So does Michigan. I think South Carolina does too. Ridiculous. The media spins the results of independent voters into a mandate for moderates, if you ask me.
15 posted on 01/10/2008 12:39:29 PM PST by mmichaels1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

Yawn. Wake me up when Fred wants to abolish entire agencies and departments. This is nothing more than a band-aid.


16 posted on 01/10/2008 12:40:39 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Seahawks should have went South for the winter - instead they're coming to Lambeau!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Texas Federalist
Iowa does not.

You're right.
17 posted on 01/10/2008 12:42:00 PM PST by mmichaels1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: rocksblues

We don’t allow independents to vote in our caucus or primary in Iowa. You must declare as Rep or Dem to vote.

However, you can declare that night - there is no registration deadline. Most switch and then switch back a couple of days later.


18 posted on 01/10/2008 12:43:28 PM PST by Free Vulcan (No prisoners. No mercy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
So far, one of the few candidates we see measurable, specific plans form.

Much better than just emptily shouting "Change!" and "Hope!"

19 posted on 01/10/2008 12:45:19 PM PST by Charles Henrickson (FRederalist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
He already has said that in one of the previous debates. The difference is this is a realistic start versus going for an all or nothing approach. Realistically, what do you think has a better chance of actually making changes, Fred's incremental approach starting with cutting the fluff out of the departments, or jump right in with proposing completely eliminating departments?
20 posted on 01/10/2008 12:45:45 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson