Posted on 01/10/2008 10:46:51 AM PST by Live Free NH
>>>I’d guess it’s because they cannot isolate the fraudulent votes from valid ones with certainty, nor can you determine which candidates had what volume of such votes.
That is exactly my point. Makes it a very iffy criteria.
No, the criteria is pretty straightforward. The votes were iffy.
So do you think that the other three Republican candidates with less than 5% support should also be included, or just Duncan Hunter?
Do the others have any delegates?
Is this a first? I mean, I could understand if it was some porn star or such not being allowed at the debates but this has got to be a first for them to exclude a legitimate candidate who holds an important position in Congress and government and at least registers a percentage on polls and has a delegate. For them to exclude a man who especially fought for his country also enrages me. And I am truly enraged. I blame the entire GOP for this effort as well. It is obvious there’s a dirty game going on here that is crossing the line. The GOP is no longer tolerable.
Hunter should endorse no one. They are all the same old, same old with their own problems on major issues. And I don’t think Fred would mind one bit if McCain got the nomination. Why don’t you drop the panic as you seem to be trying to erase Fred’s own record of McCain worship.
Isn’t it funny how that very poster themselves says how they like Hunter?!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.