The GOP polling was fine. It was the Hillary-stolen election results that differed from polling. You would have a better argument if you were talking about a Democrat candidate, not Hunter.
How do you know the GOP polling was fine? The polls were off by 7 to 15 points. If you add that to Hunter’s polls, he gets into the debate, wins it like he won the last one, and takes his momentum into Nevada (where he has the endorsement of Nevada GOP somthin-or-other) and smokes South Carolina where he basically tied tootyfruityrudy in the Spartanburg straw poll. But instead, we have the MSM excluding this candidate on the basis of polls that are conducted by the MSM and the polls are proven WRONG. But that doesn’t stop them, they proceed anyways, even though there are ACTUAL delegates to Hunter’s name at the time of New Hampshire and Tootyfruityrudy had NONE.
You can’t say that this part of the puddle is fine, that other part is the one that’s poisoned. Not in this republic. Not if you’re a conservative. But you can say it if you’re a partisan. Thanks for exposing your agenda.