Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kevmo

The GOP polling was fine. It was the Hillary-stolen election results that differed from polling. You would have a better argument if you were talking about a Democrat candidate, not Hunter.


71 posted on 01/10/2008 6:48:05 AM PST by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: GraniteStateConservative

How do you know the GOP polling was fine? The polls were off by 7 to 15 points. If you add that to Hunter’s polls, he gets into the debate, wins it like he won the last one, and takes his momentum into Nevada (where he has the endorsement of Nevada GOP somthin-or-other) and smokes South Carolina where he basically tied tootyfruityrudy in the Spartanburg straw poll. But instead, we have the MSM excluding this candidate on the basis of polls that are conducted by the MSM and the polls are proven WRONG. But that doesn’t stop them, they proceed anyways, even though there are ACTUAL delegates to Hunter’s name at the time of New Hampshire and Tootyfruityrudy had NONE.

You can’t say that this part of the puddle is fine, that other part is the one that’s poisoned. Not in this republic. Not if you’re a conservative. But you can say it if you’re a partisan. Thanks for exposing your agenda.


139 posted on 01/10/2008 12:42:57 PM PST by Kevmo (Duncan Hunter won't "let some arrogant corporate media executive decide whether this campaign's over)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson