Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: My_Name_is_a_Number

A strong law requiring voter ID is long overdue.I certainly hope the supreme court upholds Indiana law. The full article made mention that the court may uphold with some changes. I hope they will look at the possibility of requiring votes to be cast only in the state where you received the ID. That will help eliminate one of the favorite frauds perpetrated by the Dems. Double voting. Hundreds of illegal votes are cast every election in winter hot spots like Florida when large amounts of easterners go there for the winter and also vote in their home state via absentee ballot.


15 posted on 01/09/2008 8:39:40 PM PST by cquiggy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cquiggy
That will help eliminate one of the favorite frauds perpetrated by the Dems. Double voting. Hundreds of illegal votes are cast every election in winter hot spots like Florida when large amounts of easterners go there for the winter and also vote in their home state via absentee ballot.

Not to mention the common practice of college students who vote in the town of their school as well as with an absentee ballot from their home state.

I live in a city that has several colleges, including three just in my neighborhood, and most of the kids live out of state yet vote at my polling place.  You can't tell me they represent tens of thousands of double democrat votes.

24 posted on 01/09/2008 8:50:23 PM PST by MNnice (Da ma Dakota)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: cquiggy
A strong law requiring voter ID is long overdue.

Strong voter ID laws will be the end of the modern Democrat Party.

39 posted on 01/09/2008 9:11:00 PM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Elections have consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: cquiggy

requiring votes to be cast only in the state where you received the ID...

I would think that EVERY state would go for this since it would take the question of residency off the table and ‘force’ people to declare where they live - as a tax issue, not so much a voting issue. Making people do it for voting purposes is simply a back-door approach to tax revenue, if you think about it. Wouldn’t states be in favor of it?


207 posted on 01/12/2008 8:35:13 AM PST by Dasaji (The U.S.A. is the Land of Opportunity and you've got 50 states to do it in!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson