To: what's up
As far as I can tell, they all claim to be FOR strong national defense other than Paul. Left him off because he's an anti-war moonbat.
79 posted on
01/09/2008 5:48:50 PM PST by
Jim Robinson
(Our God-given unalienable rights are not open to debate, negotiation or compromise!)
To: Jim Robinson
As far as I can tell, they all claim to be FOR strong national defense And this is explicit proof why ANY ONE of these Repubs would be better than a Dem.
Far better if one believes that Defense if the #1 issue.
To: Jim Robinson
I can’t picture Huckabee being strong on defense. He’s too into lefty interpretations of scripture. Of course they all read Free Republic, and now he will be beefing up his warfare stance.
To: Jim Robinson
As far as I can tell, they all claim to be FOR strong national defense other than Paul. Left him off because he's an anti-war moonbat. Paul wouldn't have any boxes checked, save perhaps the spinner box. And Paul's record is strong on national defense, but extremely weak on national offense.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson