[GodGunsGuts]

I would say, the more we learn how “fine-tuned” life is, the more we should be looking for the possibility of a “fine-tuner.”

[doc1019]

Excellent point!

[CottShop]

[[I would say, the more we learn how “fine-tuned” life is, the more we should be looking for the possibility of a “fine-tuner.”]]

True, that would be the logical step to take, but unfortunately, that won’t happen- the Design Denialists have the ever obscure “We don’t know how it evolved, but we might one day” mantra to fall back on if explanations are not available- having an unfalsifiable hypothesis covers a multitude of biological sins it seems- and let’s never forget, those of us who look for the logical explanations based on the facts are the psuedoscientists and psuedosciecne followers while those who state time + biological mistakes answers everything (Regardless of a complete lack of evidence to back that pipedream up)- Never question the god of Naturalism- it’s advocates get ugly if you do.

Garjog wrote [[A code is a basic construct of language. Only intelligent beings use language. If biology has built in codes, it implies an intelligent code giver created it all. Seems rather intuitive to me.]]

Tsk Tsk- everyone knows that when 1000 violins are uncovered in an ancient ruins that they must have evolved from raw materials. Never question the god of materialism.

[Aquinasfan]

I would say, the more we learn how “fine-tuned” life is, the more we should be looking for the possibility of a “fine-tuner.”

Random changes fine tune things. Don't you find that to be true in your everyday life? < /s>