To: GodGunsGuts
Very interesting, but the article looks like good basic science.
It will not help creationism one bit. Sorry.
5 posted on
01/08/2008 7:37:39 PM PST by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
To: Coyoteman
It will not help creationism one bit. Sorry.
Aah, come on. Do you have to be such a one-trick pony? Such a one note Johnny? (three cord wonder?)
You're deeper than that. I've even seen you be that way, a time or two... 8^)
13 posted on
01/08/2008 7:53:30 PM PST by
BlueDragon
(never set out to sea on a boat that has shiny pump handles...)
To: Coyoteman
==It will not help creationism one bit.
God’s creation does not need the help of science. Quite the contrary...Science needs God’s creation.
To: Coyoteman
23 posted on
01/08/2008 8:56:10 PM PST by
NonValueAdded
("Hillary ... a product whose sell-by date has passed" (OMG, I'm quoting Shrum))
To: Coyoteman
25 posted on
01/08/2008 9:05:45 PM PST by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: Coyoteman
It will not help creationism one bit. actually, it does, by exposing the guys who say they know so much as frauds.
36 posted on
01/09/2008 2:23:56 AM PST by
gusopol3
To: Coyoteman
Very interesting, but the article looks like good basic science. It will not help creationism one bit. Sorry. Actually, if it's good basic science, this can only help creationism. The more good, basic, non-politicised science we get, the more evolution is falsified and the more the field opens up for reconsideration of alternatives.
To: Coyoteman
47 posted on
01/09/2008 6:21:39 AM PST by
sobieski
To: Coyoteman
“It will not help creationism one bit.” If you’re referring to young earth creationism, I would agree whole-heartedly. Old Earth creation is a different kettle of fish, however.
86 posted on
01/09/2008 9:50:25 AM PST by
MHGinTN
(Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
To: Coyoteman; GodGunsGuts
"
It will not help creationism one bit." But then it isn't creationism that needs any help; its a perfect fit for the real world. Its evolutionism that is beyond lifesupport. Its failure to mesh with the abundant natural repudiation of its premises has left it in shambles.
137 posted on
01/09/2008 4:24:27 PM PST by
editor-surveyor
(Turning the general election into a second Democrat primary is not a winning strategy.)
To: Coyoteman
I just must get my piano evolved. Perhaps if it sits in the corner long enough, it will evolve into proper pitch.
159 posted on
01/10/2008 10:15:38 AM PST by
Twinkie
(Faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the Word of God . . .)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson