Yes he did- He insinuated that speciation- which is nothign more than MICROEvoltuiopnary changes is the all that is required for MACROEvolution, and that ios flat out wrong for hte reasons explained i nthe link I provided. Ring Species are nothign more than subspecies changed by MICROEvolutionary genetic mistakes- nothign more- Baraminology accounts for such speciation within the KINDS, Nothign biologically surprising about them as they follow genetic ‘rules’ as it were that fall well within the KINDS parameters.
I have never seen any evidence for evolution whatsoever. The only thing that is verified by the available evidence is a starting point (ie cambrian explosion), then devolutionary specialization. Do you know of any examples of evolution from tracing a simple to a more complex one? I have honestly never heard of any evidence that demonstrates such a thing.