[[You are simply lying. Every phenomenon or process required for evolution is routinely observed and manipulated by experiment.]]
Let me just expand my response to more fully address your accusation- Words matter JS- Every phenomena and process has NOT been observed- MACROEvolution requires NEW ifnormation laterally transfered between different KINDS so that one kind receives NEW non-species specific information This has NOT been observed in hte wild EXCEPT between the same KINDS only htrough lab generated gentic manipulation and under ideal conditions conducive to the manipulations can interspecies lateral gene transference occure AND, and this is important, AND, the species receiving the leteral infromation has several layers of built in protections preventing it from perverting it beyond species specific upper limits- AS WELL, the simple transference material does nothign to move the species beyond it’s own KIND, it simply becomes a host and correction mechanisms immediately kick in to begin correcting hte mistake.
You can use argumentum ad CAPSLOCK all you want, but you are misinformed. There is no one writing about information theory who doubts common descent. This includes ID advocates like Behe and Dembsky, and the guy who literally wrote the book on bioinformatics: Hubert Yockey.