Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: newbie2008

2 our of 50 means nothing yet other then “republicans” in Iowa and NH are not Republicans.


2 posted on 01/08/2008 6:22:09 PM PST by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: edcoil

I expect SC to be a barn burner


7 posted on 01/08/2008 6:34:53 PM PST by Fred (McCain..'HIS EGO IS WRITING CHECKS HIS BODY CAN'T CASH')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: edcoil

NH had a history of always picking the future President. Up until Clinton, no candidate had won the Presidency without winning NH. Times have changed, unfortunately.


10 posted on 01/08/2008 6:45:54 PM PST by CASchack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: edcoil

When Ron Paul pulls 8 percent vs Thompson’s 1 percent, I want nothing to do with NH or NE.


11 posted on 01/08/2008 6:48:10 PM PST by ONEBYEONE (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: edcoil
Now, I want to remind all my Republican friends that there are many states after Iowa and New Hampshire where the Republican populations are far more indicative of the conservative base...and hopefully where independents won't have as much opportunity to vote in any party election they want - a sure recipe for mischief-making IMO.........
44 posted on 01/08/2008 8:28:17 PM PST by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson