To: newbie2008
2 our of 50 means nothing yet other then “republicans” in Iowa and NH are not Republicans.
2 posted on
01/08/2008 6:22:09 PM PST by
edcoil
(Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
To: edcoil
I expect SC to be a barn burner
7 posted on
01/08/2008 6:34:53 PM PST by
Fred
(McCain..'HIS EGO IS WRITING CHECKS HIS BODY CAN'T CASH')
To: edcoil
NH had a history of always picking the future President. Up until Clinton, no candidate had won the Presidency without winning NH. Times have changed, unfortunately.
10 posted on
01/08/2008 6:45:54 PM PST by
CASchack
To: edcoil
When Ron Paul pulls 8 percent vs Thompson’s 1 percent, I want nothing to do with NH or NE.
11 posted on
01/08/2008 6:48:10 PM PST by
ONEBYEONE
(u)
To: edcoil
Now, I want to remind all my Republican friends that there are many states after Iowa and New Hampshire where the Republican populations are far more indicative of the conservative base...and hopefully where independents won't have as much opportunity to vote in any party election they want - a sure recipe for mischief-making IMO.........
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson