Fred chose not to campaign in liberal New Hampshire and for good reason. He's a southern conservative, who didn't want to waste his effort.
Obviously, Romney impresses you. Romney has spent million of dollars, of which roughly $20 million was his own money. And what does he have to show for it? NOTHING!
This is not a traditional race like we've seen for the past 20 years. Guliani's support hasn't even begun to kick in, but it will in FL, NY, NJ, CT, and so on. Huck will probably fade some. So long as no candidate wins three in a row, I think ALL of them will stay in and it will be about amassing delegates, not, as in the past, winning states per se.
Kucinich has twice as many votes as Fred...WOW!
Romney is Bush with brains and actual management talent. He would be better than the haters here think. Thanks for sticking us with McCain and Huckabee.
Romney is Bush with brains and actual management talent. He would be better than the haters here think. Thanks for sticking us with McCain and Huckabee.
>Obviously, Romney impresses you. Romney has spent million of dollars, of which roughly $20 million was his own money. And what does he have to show for it? NOTHING!
Well, he does have the most delegates so far. That will mean nothing IF he fares poorly in the next states.
Since you want to be that way, how many delegates does Fred have? And some are saying he only needs to come in 3rd in SC to be viable? And what % did he get in NH? I don’t buy it he didn’t campaign in NW. I know he made a big deal though of leaving on a bus for SC before the vote count could start. That seemed a little manipulative. He knew he was going to lose big and was acting like a sore loser. If you want to be mean and tell Mitt to drop out when he has the most delegates, then I need to point out the obvious.