To all; We must consider two issues in this election. Judges and Islamo Terrorists.
Agree. Jay Sekulow trusts that Mitt will appoint good judges. That’s why Jay endorsed Mitt Romney!
Amen. That is ultimately what this is all about. Imagine an Obama Supreme Court nominee. Or worse, a Hillary nominee. With a Democratic Congress no less. It sshakes me to the core.
At first glance, that sounds good. Looks like a good foundational jumping-off point where we could build a consensus upon.
But you forget about the 1860 historical precent.
Supposedly all we needed then were judges who would overturn the infamous Dred Scott Supreme Court decision that left slaves confirmed as "property." Supposedly all we needed then was a POTUS & judges who could help protect against slavery expansion.
Supposedly all we needed then were protections in place vs. Southerner maverick secessionists-terrorists.
Why, we didn't need any fervent GOP anti-slavery candidate. Why, an anti-Dred Scott & anti-slavery expansionist like Lincoln would do just fine (Lincoln in 1859-1860 didn't want to tackle slavery in southern states, only slavery in the new states & territories as well as the slave trade).
But what was Lincoln's rear-view mirror vantage point at his second inaugural speech in March of 1865 shortly before his death?
Fondly do we hope, fervently do we pray, that this mighty scourge of war may speedily pass away. Yet, if God wills that it continue until all the wealth piled by the bondsman's two hundred and fifty years of unrequited toil shall be sunk, and until every drop of blood drawn with the lash shall be paid by another drawn with the sword, as was said three thousand years ago, so still it must be said "the judgments of the Lord are true and righteous altogether."
In other words, all these issues were inter-connected. The reason more blood was shed in the Civil War than American soldiers' blood in all other U.S. wars put together was bound up as Lincoln said, in the "judgments of the Lord"--linked to "250 years of unrequited toil" & lash-induced blood upon slaves.
Perhaps, just perhaps, the reason why the U.S. isn't under a firm "protection" of God's Hand from terrorists at all times is becomes babies in the womb aren't under a firm "protection" of Uncle Sam's hand at almost any time.
So, when GOP voters vote for a candidate who doesn't talk about what Reagan & Bush did--implement the Mexico City policy that would keep the international abortion industry from being funded--that's more blood dripping from the womb.
When GOP voters elevate a candidate who doesn't talk about attempting to reduce funding for the domestic abortion industry--but instead favors a candidate like Romney who places the abortion industry as a permanent placeholder for RomneyCare (Planned Parenthood League of MA)--that's more blood dripping from the womb.
When GOP voters elevate a candidate who doesn't want to talk about abortion like Reagan's book did during his presidency--ABORTION: THE CONSCIENCE OF A NATION--that's more blood dripping from the womb.
You see, it goes beyond just "judges" and Islamo-terrorism, because it's Americans who are terrorizing the womb--not Muslims.