They may not be. But calling someone “exposed” because they don’t support Hunter or Fred, both of whom have very little support or chance of winning, that seems like a bit of a stretch. I love Fred, and like McCain, but that doesn’t mean that I slander those who support other candidates. The whole atmosphere of “support Hunter or Fred or you’re a liberal” really doesn’t help engender unity or love for the candidates. Just a humble observation, but, by merely listening to the supporters on FR threads, I’d not like him at all.
Just my two cents. Go Fred, McCain, and, ultimately, anyone but Paul or Huck.
And just an observation concerning McCain’s victory speech. I’m amazed that people can get worked up at such a non-inspirational, non-charismatic prepared speech.
That seemed almost as staged as a Hillary rally.
“And just an observation concerning McCain’s victory speech. I’m amazed that people can get worked up at such a non-inspirational, non-charismatic prepared speech.”
Wasn’t that awful?
I just made a comment that he couldn’t even say “thank you,” without reading it...and stumbling on the words at that!
This is Free Republic, we support and promote conservative candidates. Fred and Hunter are our top two choices. Nuff said.
Wow, I totally agree with your post. I wonder what the agenda is with the few posters who insist on constantly attacking anyone who merely NOTICES that the most conservative candidates have flaws in their campaigns, or accusing posters of being a liberal because they are willing in a general to vote for the most conservative candidate with a CHANCE. I’m a financial supporter of both Thompson & Hunter, but some of their “supporters” on FR do them NO favors.
And about McCain’s speech— I was thinking the same thing— awful. At least Huckaboob could give a decent (if fluff-filled) speech. Why do I keep seeing a McCain/ Huckabee ticket? I think I need to vomit.