To: K-oneTexas
Sounds like you like Romney the liberal.
Gotcha! LOL
165 posted on
01/08/2008 6:01:44 PM PST by
Reagan Man
(FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
To: Reagan Man
Actually I don't support Romney ... I prefer Hunter. He is likable as an individual but he does not reflect my thinking in regards to many of the issues. The bottom line here, between the two States is ... the first choice is vastly different but the second choice is the same ... regardless of the reasoning for the vote.
I'm just trying to analyze in my mind what might be happening. I don't think there is a 'loser' till the respective conventions kick all others to the curb but one.
.
On the Dem side if the projections are right ... the Dem choice appears to be up in the air for a consistent first and second place.
Results
Iowa Dems - Obama (38%); Edwards (30%); Clinton (29%)
Iowa Repubs - Huckabee (34%); Romney (25%); Thompson (13%)
Early Results (8:30PM)
New Hampshire Dems - Clinton (40%); Obama (30%); Edwards (17%)
New Hampshire Repubs - McCain (37%); Romney (29%); Huckabee (12%)
But more than that it's interesting to see the what the results represent. (I'd include the total numbers of votes but I don't have those at hand.) Such as the big turnouts. Speculation on my part - yes. But none the less actively using the 'gray matter'. (I know I'm not a pundit ... just my opinion.)
As I said in my Primary it's Hunter. I'll have to wait and see what choice I have in the General Election. Take care.
227 posted on
01/08/2008 6:26:42 PM PST by
K-oneTexas
(I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson