Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MHGinTN
U Said: The more you post, the more effluent comes spittling out to defend your peepstone divination liar who proclaimed himself a prophet and tried to rewrite the Bible to fabricate prophecy of 'his coming in these latter days':

Joseph smith needs no defense from me, all I am trying to do is correct the misstatements that are made by anti Mormons made on these threads. While I am here, I continually testify of Jesus, and encourage others to gain a testimony as I have. If this is effluent, then may everyone understand the Crap you are posting, come unto Jesus, and testify of him too.

I Said: Your problem seems to be that you believe Satan can keep God from answering prayers ..."

U Said: If that is the extent of your reasoning capacity and you represent Mormonism, May God help Mormons to see the demons directing them!

This is what your side has to believe to believe that a prayer to God (which God has promised to answer in the Bible) will be answered by Satan instead.

U Said: Actually, that is more your deviousness in trying to stand up a strawman to shoot at, but the blasphemy you spittle so casually seems to evade your attention since you just handle it to sling it at someone else. We've addressed your devilish effort to fabricate that fractured syllogism about god's impotence if satan can answer the prayers of those tempting God, before. Need we expose you again?

In a word, yes.

Do you or do you not believe that Joseph smith was visited by Satan disguised as an angel of light? (I can post links to posts where you say exactly that, any body can who looks at your back posts....)

The points that Joseph was praying to God for an answer, and was specifically trying to find out which PROTESTANT church to join, not with standing, if Joseph was praying, then Satan answering the prayer means evry thing I said is true.

Expose again, it won't change the truth.
2,014 posted on 01/29/2008 11:03:12 AM PST by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2006 | View Replies ]


To: DelphiUser

The fractured syllogism was addressed in post #704 of this very thread. Your irrationality hasn’t changed since then I see.


2,031 posted on 01/29/2008 12:28:09 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2014 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson