Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mnehrling
SJackson, I just saw this... I think I have to fix what I've been saying, I thought he was only on there about six times. Who was it who said that just going on a 'couple of times' is no proof of a relationship or something on those lines?

That doesn't surprise me. Six or so have been mentioned, but that's just the last few years. I haven't a clue where anyone could find that number, only Ron Paul and Alex Jones know for sure, and they're not talking.

That Paul is the candidate of choice on the right of Jewhaters, racists, conspiracy nuts and anti-American "patriots" has been pretty well established. To what extent Paul shares their beliefs, rather than simply wanting their $$$, has been open to question. As I've noted many times, the answer was likely to be found in the decade plus of newsletters he refuses to release. The six posted on FR gave a hint. It's clear that if he's not a racist and conspiracy nut, the highlights here don't support Jewhater, he's sure comfortable not only having these folk around, but if the paulistinian excuse is to be believed, writing in his name for over a decade.

He's not a Republican, and most people including the media seem to realize that. This kind of stuff is what keeps third parties afloat, and marginalized. The Libertarian Party should shun this guy.

BTW, if two libraries have a few of these newsletters, others will emerge.

Newsletters

Ron Paul: US "military is mowing civilians down in the streets"

RON PAUL ACCUSED U.S. TROOPS OF WAR CRIMES IN DESERT STORM

Ron Paul: Israel bought Jesse Helms

Ron Paul: Traitor had direct line to President Reagan

Ron Paul: Clinton didn't cut defense enough

RON PAUL ON DEFENSE SPENDING

Ron Paul supported the PLO terrorists

32 posted on 01/08/2008 11:29:56 AM PST by SJackson (If 45 million children had lived, they'd be defending America, filling jobs, paying SS-Z. Miller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: SJackson
It's clear that if he's not a racist and conspiracy nut, the highlights here don't support Jewhater, he's sure comfortable not only having these folk around, but if the paulistinian excuse is to be believed, writing in his name for over a decade.

For someone so godd at digging up research, your English composition is horrendous. How are people supposed to understand that?

44 posted on 01/08/2008 11:41:57 AM PST by jmc813 (Don't screw this up, vote for Thompson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson; mnehrling

If you want some fun, check the comment section at the PajamasMedia article Ron Paul Bigotry Revolution: http://pajamasmedia.com/2008/01/ron_paul.php - a good sustained paulistas assault.


116 posted on 01/08/2008 12:15:15 PM PST by Tolik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson