To: lormand
I actually think they should stay (most of them at least). Many are good for debate outside Paul forums and a few are actually good folks. The debates also hit google, so when you google, say, ron paul and immigration, bam, some free republic threads pop up. This is helping backfire on the Google Ron Paul theme. It is also a good way for us to distinguish from the other sites.
To: mnehrling
I understand your points, but I would rather a forum composed of like minded people rather than having a few Cindy Sheehan clones infesting the place.
270 posted on
01/08/2008 2:04:44 PM PST by
lormand
(Paultards - Political Hemorrhoids)
To: mnehrling
I actually think they should stay (most of them at least).I'd agree. I have a problem with dropping someone off the rolls because of policy disagreements. If they get personally obnoxious, then yes, they should go.
But I do like your arguments for their staying.
271 posted on
01/08/2008 2:05:49 PM PST by
bcsco
(Huckleberry Hound - Another dope from Hope!)
To: mnehrling
I actually think they should stay (most of them at least). Many are good for debate outside Paul forums and a few are actually good folks. The debates also hit google, so when you google, say, ron paul and immigration, bam, some free republic threads pop up. This is helping backfire on the Google Ron Paul theme. It is also a good way for us to distinguish from the other sites.You're one of the few people on these Paul threads that aren't more than half retarded.
279 posted on
01/08/2008 2:14:18 PM PST by
jmc813
(Don't screw this up, vote for Thompson.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson