[mnehring]

Yea, I saw.. that isn’t good for those here who were taking the approach that the comments weren’t bad and it was just PC to be critical, they were just called small minded.. Maybe they should have gone back to the ‘he never wrote them’ response. It would have been safer.

[no-s]

The "out of context" quotes in the smear article are mixed in topic. If a person defends the premise that say, race rioters are essentially barbarians, it does not follow that he agrees with the premise that "Barbara Jordan was a half-educated victimologist".

The fact that you seem to revel in bashing the folks who have not managed to wrap their heads around the whole issue and are still discovering the inconsistencies in the smear is more revealing of your character.

Your postings reveal a taste for sowing discord and confusion. You do not write to enlighten the reader and enhance the accuracy of discussion, Instead, you seek confusion and irritation it's own sake.

You should know by now New Republic is on the record for passing fiction as fact, lying about it, and in general diminishing it's reputation, e.g. the Scott Thomas affair. You have allied yourself with the enemies of truth and champions of discord.

In reading the similar attacks on Ron Paul defenders on this subject in the blogosphere, I find a great deal of duplication including outright cut and paste operations. This smacks of an attempt to "google-bomb" the subject so as to make it difficult for the curious to discover anything other than the smear.

I invite you to read for yourself what Ron Paul has to say about racism.