Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Angry White Man (The bigoted "past" of Ron Paul. Calls black people "animals")
New Republic ^ | January 8, 2008 | James Kirchick

Posted on 01/08/2008 11:04:11 AM PST by mnehring

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 381-395 next last
To: from occupied ga
Of course only a nut would make such claims.

Also note this:

AIDS, "a politically protected disease thanks to payola and the influence of the homosexual lobby," and used it as a rhetorical club to beat gay people in general. ..."The ACT-UP slogan, on stickers plastered all over Manhattan, is 'Silence = Death.' But shouldn't it be 'Sodomy = Death'?"

No one is allowed to say that. The warnings about the blood supply were bourne out by experience - in Australia, calls to ban homosexuals from giving blood were not heeded until 1985, after a series of deaths - but anyway, no one is allowed to say it.

221 posted on 01/08/2008 1:10:58 PM PST by BlackVeil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Reaganfan

ping


222 posted on 01/08/2008 1:11:26 PM PST by lormand (Paultards - Political Hemorrhoids)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga
Of course only a nut would make such claims.

Also note this:

AIDS, "a politically protected disease thanks to payola and the influence of the homosexual lobby," and used it as a rhetorical club to beat gay people in general. ..."The ACT-UP slogan, on stickers plastered all over Manhattan, is 'Silence = Death.' But shouldn't it be 'Sodomy = Death'?"

No one is allowed to say that. The warnings about the blood supply were bourne out by experience - in Australia, calls to ban homosexuals from giving blood were not heeded until 1985, after a series of deaths - but anyway, no one is allowed to say it.

223 posted on 01/08/2008 1:11:27 PM PST by BlackVeil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
“This story is old news and has been rehashed for over a decade. It’s once again being resurrected for obvious political reasons on the day of the New Hampshire primary.

Ron Paul is a liar, one statement came out ten years ago. Those newsletters have been requested for years, most recently by the NYTimes early in 2007, Paul refused accusing the reporter of trying to paint him as an antisemite, and by the JTA, Paul refused to return their calls. And Paul has always refused to release them.

“The quotations in The New Republic article are not mine and do not represent what I believe or have ever believed. I have never uttered such words and denounce such small-minded thoughts.

For over a decade Ron Paul sold newsletters under the name Ron Paul ....., the clear implication being it's written by Ron Paul, cashed the checks, mailed the newsletters and we're to believe he never read them.

I don't believe him, but if true, he's an incompetant unqualified to be dogcatcher. What kind of idiot rents his name to racists and doesn't notice.

224 posted on 01/08/2008 1:13:11 PM PST by SJackson (If 45 million children had lived, they'd be defending America, filling jobs, paying SS-Z. Miller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: jmc813

Reason had the story when I did a search. LOL

Kirchick admits he’s a mere propagandist, not a journalist: http://gays-for-ron.blogspot.com/2008/01/jamie-kirchick-i-dont-think-ron-paul-is.html


225 posted on 01/08/2008 1:13:28 PM PST by rineaux (tagline on strike.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
For the last time, IF A WORDS ENDS WITH THE LETTERS "ST", YOU STILL USE AN S TO PLURALIZE IT!!!!!

From your post #32: "For someone so godd at digging up research, your English composition is horrendous. How are people supposed to understand that?

FOR THE FIRST AND LAST TIME! THERE IS NO WORD "GODD". FOR SOMEONE SO PETTY AT CRITICIZING OTHERS, YOUR OWN HABITS ARE HORRENDOUS.

Get a life.

226 posted on 01/08/2008 1:15:00 PM PST by bcsco (Huckleberry Hound - Another dope from Hope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: lormand; SJackson
"You'd have no problem with the Giulianites infesting FR again?" Are you making this up? I have not seen any evidence of this, and I frequent this forum almost as often as you do.

You posted that the litmus test for freepers should be supporting the war. SJackson's buddies on the FR exile sites certainly fit this mold, but I wouldn't want most of 'em back.

227 posted on 01/08/2008 1:15:27 PM PST by jmc813 (Don't screw this up, vote for Thompson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: lormand

Can’t tell the difference between a complaint about a chat topic being posted in breaking news and a Paul-bot’s whine... interesting. You should get out in real life more often.


228 posted on 01/08/2008 1:16:08 PM PST by green iguana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: green iguana
Right now there are at least three Hillary bashing threads, two Obama, and two McCain in Breaking news, and one Paul. Why should Paul be treated with kid gloves?
229 posted on 01/08/2008 1:16:23 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: green iguana
"Can’t tell the difference between a complaint about a chat topic being posted in breaking news and a Paul-bot’s whine... interesting."

I guess they can only be mutually exclusive right?

230 posted on 01/08/2008 1:18:19 PM PST by lormand (Paultards - Political Hemorrhoids)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
Right now there are at least three Hillary bashing threads, two Obama, and two McCain in Breaking news, and one Paul. Why should Paul be treated with kid gloves?

Because Hillary, Obama and McCain all suck worse than Paul and each of them actually has a chance of being nominated?

231 posted on 01/08/2008 1:18:46 PM PST by jmc813 (Don't screw this up, vote for Thompson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: jmc813; lormand
You posted that the litmus test for freepers should be supporting the war. SJackson's buddies on the FR exile sites certainly fit this mold, but I wouldn't want most of 'em back.

Specifics troll, specifics. Post specifics from your internet research.

232 posted on 01/08/2008 1:21:08 PM PST by SJackson (If 45 million children had lived, they'd be defending America, filling jobs, paying SS-Z. Miller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: bcsco; jmc813
"FOR THE FIRST AND LAST TIME! THERE IS NO WORD "GODD". FOR SOMEONE SO PETTY AT CRITICIZING OTHERS, YOUR OWN HABITS ARE HORRENDOUS."

;) Amen. It is easy to make a fool look foolish.
233 posted on 01/08/2008 1:21:41 PM PST by jrooney (Ron Paul called Reagan a Dramatic Failure and thinks he is smarter than Abe Lincoln.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
Right, but based on the amount of press Paul gets, statistically there will be something in Breaking occasionally. I recall one yesterday and one today, that seems pretty small for the amount of threads posted.
234 posted on 01/08/2008 1:24:41 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
"Because Hillary, Obama and McCain all suck worse than Paul and each of them actually has a chance of being nominated?"

Wrong, they are equally rejectable.

However, even Hitlery makes Ron Paul look like tinkerbell with regards to the Iraq War. She has more balls than the Groin-0-cologist (stolen from Archie Bunker) congressgirl from Texas, Dr. No.

235 posted on 01/08/2008 1:24:57 PM PST by lormand (Paultards - Political Hemorrhoids)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

He shouldn’t be. Most of ‘em are chat material. “Sexist Protesters...” yuck. I should not have limited it to Paul. The Admin Moderators are usually so quick to pull stuff like this from Breaking - guess it’s just the season. Sorry to single you out.


236 posted on 01/08/2008 1:25:13 PM PST by green iguana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

Ping

Thanks and Bookmark for later perusal


237 posted on 01/08/2008 1:25:29 PM PST by Leofl (I'm from Texas, we don't dial 9-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jrooney
;) Amen.

I see questionable spelling, construction and thought patterns all the time on FR. I don't take offense because I know people edit, even reedit their writing before posting, and that elicits mistakes. No harm, no foul.

To get off on criticizing others because of bloopers is really dumb.

238 posted on 01/08/2008 1:26:24 PM PST by bcsco (Huckleberry Hound - Another dope from Hope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: ksen

That is not Ron Paul’s position regarding Israel.

His position, consistently, has been to abandon Israel — starting with starting a coalition that forced Reagan to withdraw from Lebanon and leave it in shambles (for the terrorists to take over) on Israel’s border.


239 posted on 01/08/2008 1:26:45 PM PST by MeanWestTexan (Kol Hakavod Fred Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
Are you confused or feigning ignorance? The best way to be clear about Dr. Paul's thoughts and intentions is to read his own words and let him speak for himself if he should, in retrospect, wish to clarify himself. The title of this thread implies that Dr. Paul considers black people to be animals, and as such some folks would associate him directly, or indirectly with racists. I would expect such semantic thuggery from the DBM, but not from people who post here.
". . . I represent what Republicanism used to be. I represent the group that wanted to get rid of the Department of Education, the part, that part of the Republican Party that used to be non-interventionists overseas. That was the tradition, the Robert/Taft wing of the party. There was a time when the Republicans defended individual liberty and the Constitution and decreased spending. So the radicals, the ones who really don't belong in the Republican Party and why the Republican Party is shrinking, why the base is so small, is because they don't stand for these ideals any more. So I stand for the ideals of the Republican Party. I've been elected 10 times as Republican. I've been a Republican all my life except for that one year that I ran as a Libertarian. But, no, I represent the Republican ideals, I think, much more so that the individuals running for the party right now." -Ron Paul

240 posted on 01/08/2008 1:30:16 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 381-395 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson