Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Godzilla

Your statement that you do not believe Section 132 refers to temple marriage shouts out that you don’t have any understanding of what that section is all about.

Might I suggest that you stop informing Mormons what their own published and copyrighted scripture means? I think the Church might know a little better about its own scripture than you do.


74 posted on 01/08/2008 12:39:27 PM PST by tortdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: tortdog
Your statement that you do not believe Section 132 refers to temple marriage shouts out that you don’t have any understanding of what that section is all about. Might I suggest that you stop informing Mormons what their own published and copyrighted scripture means? I think the Church might know a little better about its own scripture than you do.

Context is everything. There is no reference to temple anywhere in section 132. That is not how it was historically practiced by the prophet.

103 posted on 01/08/2008 1:22:26 PM PST by Godzilla (Chaos, panic, and disorder .... my work here is done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson