Yeah, a bad temper ALWAYS means a bad person who proves unsucessful at anything they attempt. Just look at the historic record: History records that Andrew Jackson had a famous temper. He even fought duels because of it...horrible president. Then there the cases of Civil War generals W.T Sherman and Stonewall Jackson, both had terrible tempers and were abysmal at what they did, weren't they? And later there was George Patton, he was really, really bad. And just look at the examples from the world of sports: Woody Hayes, Bobby Knight, even old Paul "Bear" Bryant was said to have had a bad one. Temper certainly disqualifies anyone from accomplishment. NOT!
McCain would lose at Va-Oh-Fla-Co and probably SC to Obhama.
He is broke, old, politically tarnished and without any sort of political agenda. He wants to be President not because he has any vision for the future of this country he wants to be President simply to cap off his "legacy". McCain is far too old school DC Establishment to win in 2008
If the Republicans want to lose a 1980s style landslide to Obahma, they should run John “Democrat Lite” McCain.