[rb22982]

Do you see what all the Anti-Paul’s start with or just the people defending his overall positions (Note that I disagree with him on Iraq, for example)? The Anti-Pauls on this forum started the name calling a long time ago. If the words kook, traitor, looney and truther aren’t ALL mentioned within 10 posts, I’m usually disappointed. Generally the name calling by some on the Paul said, or people defending Paul to any degree, isn’t till far later if ever except for perhaps “Neo-Con” which is generally true.

[Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus]

If the words kook, traitor, looney and truther aren’t ALL mentioned within 10 posts, I’m usually disappointed.

You forgot "collaborator".

[Allegra]

Do you see what all the Anti-Paul’s start with or just the people defending his overall positions (Note that I disagree with him on Iraq, for example)? The Anti-Pauls on this forum started the name calling a long time ago. If the words kook, traitor, looney and truther aren’t ALL mentioned within 10 posts, I’m usually disappointed. Generally the name calling by some on the Paul said, or people defending Paul to any degree, isn’t till far later if ever except for perhaps “Neo-Con” which is generally true.

That does not excuse somebody coming out and being rude and snotty to a poster who hasn't done all of that (well, not yet on this thread.)

And yes, I've been called "neocon," "statist," "warmonger," "big-government lover" and much, much worse by Paul supporters. All simply because I do not support Ron Paul.

Unfortunately, it is the sort of thing I have come to expect from the Paul crowd.