I don’t know. I can’t put my finger on it- but it’s just all too strange. I don’t mean in a tin-foil way. That she could go from such an apparent lead to this in weeks- without a major scandal..it’s stunning.
Hillary’s invincibility was a creation of the Drive-By Media. That’s gone now, and with it another chunk of the Drive-By’s credibility.
Uncomfirmed reports that both Monica Lewinski and Brittney Spears were planning on endorsing Hillary today. Clinton campaign managed to get Brittney locked away for a few days, but Monica is still on the loose.
I’ve been hearing for many months now that wherever Obama goes, people like him and gravitate toward him. And when Hillary campaigns in the same area, the contrast is startling and people notice. The MSM just didn’t report it. I’ve thought all along, based on these reports I was reading, that this might happen. In supporting Hillary and protecting her from this, they’ve done her the ultimate disservice. She believed her own hype and sense of invincibility. Plus entitlement. And bringing Bill out didn’t help.
The MSM continually touts her organization as well. Bill Crystal said this morning that Obama had built quite an effective campaign staff and that they were quietly contactly young and new voters. They are responding.
“That she could go from such an apparent lead to this in weeks- without a major scandal..it’s stunning.”
I think her candidacy may have been a total media fabrication from the start.
I wouldn’t be surprised if the true negatives for her were much higher than we were told.
Maybe 75% said they wouldn’t vote for her under ANY circumstances? I don’t know ANYONE that likes her!
They may not have believed the polling data and just decided to run her up the flagpole to see who saluted.
Perhaps the polling was rigged. Maybe she never really had that lead. Oprahs endorsement may have turned a close race into an Obama landslide.
Fellow mom, I agree. I have wondered though if HRC’s invincibility was more a media creation than a reality.