So Rush Limbaugh is man of the year but not General Petraeus who has been leading our troops to VICOTRY in Iraq or President Bush whose strong and steadfast leadership is making us win the war.
Yep. The good General was robbed.
So Rush Limbaugh is man of the year but not General Petraeus who has been leading our troops to VICOTRY in Iraq or President Bush whose strong and steadfast leadership is making us win the war.
___________________________________
The one thing Pres. Bush and Petraeus dearly needed was a gifted communicator to prevent the complete public collapse for the Iraq mission. Rush is that communicator. Rush makes war against dangerous ideas that subvert liberty and democracy, the very things trying to destroy the birth of democracy in Iraq. Rush is a living example of what Iraq will need in the future to make war against those predatory ideas seeking to destroy a blood stained democracy. Pres. Bush, Petraeus, and Rush are a team and each one does what the other cannot do. Rush has my vote this year. :0)
The argument then happily visited the old "hypocrisy" charge, which says that we must dismiss as "wrong", void, null, and without force EVERYTHING ever said or argued by anyone (make that "any conservative") found to be deficient in his own exercise of principle (and excusing ourselves from having any principles at all, of course, if we're liberals).
Good point.
Who has more enemies tho?
The General’s may be more dangerous in many ways..
but the one’s Rush fights are able to do serious damage as well... and have.
The WoT is a multi-front war, after all, being fought both overseas and in the homeland.
If any should get it, Bush but only if Cheney is co-Man with him. We won’t know what went on behind the scenes “officially” for years, but his name will show him as being in the thick of it as well.
jmo