Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: advance_copy
This paragraph, I agree with.

Back when the "other faction" thought it's media could stuff Giuliani down our throats, we were told time and again how we had to set aside our quaint little beliefs about the sanctity of life and marriage as you scolded us for our "intolerance" of "alternative lifestyles.

However Thompson and McCain are pro life. Will has a tendency to just blame Huck, who, by the way, I do not like. Will forgets his bunch of aging dopes created him.

The answer? No one gets to have it just "their way" or we lose.

When I fought against Rooty tooth and nail, I sure didn't want a Huckster to emerge.People need to get over their hurt feelings and get on to a candidate we can all get behind.

11 posted on 01/06/2008 10:15:59 AM PST by dforest (Duncan Hunter is the best hope we have on both fronts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: indylindy
However Thompson and McCain are pro life.

McCain, like Romney, is lying about it for political expediency. In 2000, he said that he does not want Roe v. Wade. He also said that it is ultimately the woman's "choice".

Thompson is pretty good on the issue, but would not support a federal ban on abortion due to his belief in federalism. Still, he'd appoint judges that overturn Roe v. Wade, and that is far more than you can say about McCain, Romney, or Giuliani.

The one thing people did not notice, but the voters in Iowa did notice, is that Mike Huckabee stood up for the sanctity of life at every campaign event. He is the only one who did that. That is why he won Iowa.
18 posted on 01/06/2008 10:24:30 AM PST by advance_copy (Stand for life or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson