I am not a fan of RG but I disagree that he alone would end the Republican Party as a pro-life party.
The platform would have to change, which it will not.
I have heard him speak about the kind of judges he would appoint, and unless he is a liar, they would be like Thomas, Scollia, and Roberts all pro-life judges personally and not activists.
If HRC wins she will appoint activists judges who promote abortions...there lies the difference.
Bush is pretty much pro-life, but even he has sometimes distanced himself from the cause. He’s never attended a pro-life rally in DC, and the women in his family have always been pro-choice. This is to keep the por-choice faction in the party from going crazy. Rudy is a member of that faction, and one cannot expect him to give more than lip-service to a cause he doesn’t believe in. Of course, both Hillary and Obama are zealots for the otgher side, so I would not hestitate to choose Rudy over either.
On the other hand, Rudy might just bust his butt to prove himself to pro-lifers that he is a man of his word. No Harriets for him. Like only Nixon could go to China-thing.
Bush is pretty much pro-life, but even he has sometimes distanced himself from the cause. He’s never attended a pro-life rally in DC, and the women in his family have always been pro-choice. This is to keep the por-choice faction in the party from going crazy. Rudy is a member of that faction, and one cannot expect him to give more than lip-service to a cause he doesn’t believe in. Of course, both Hillary and Obama are zealots for the otgher side, so I would not hestitate to choose Rudy over either.
On the other hand, Rudy might just bust his butt to prove himself to pro-lifers that he is a man of his word. No Harriets for him. Like only Nixon could go to China-thing.