Replies

rather late me thinks

Obvious conclusions that the thoughtful public has long accepted are traditionally late in coming from "Official" channels such as a Bishop of the Church of England, but they are helpful nonetheless in that they have the effect of bringing essential, if long overdue, topics to the table. In this instance it's quite telling to see the Islamofascist Response to the Bishop's rather hesitant, weak and tentative yet glaringly obvious conclusions:

Bishop Nazir-Ali, whose father converted from Islam to Catholicism, was criticised by Ibrahim Mogra, of the Muslim Council of Britain. He said: "It's irresponsible for a man of his position to make these comments.

"He should accept that Britain is a multicultural society in which we are free to follow our religion at the same time as being extremely proud to be British. We wouldn't allow 'no-go' areas to happen. I smell extreme intolerance when people criticise multiculturalism without proper evidence of what has gone wrong."

So, according to Ibrahim Mogra, the Bishop of Rochester is lying ("We wouldn't allow 'no-go' areas to happen.") and such statements shouldn't even be uttered ("It's irresponsible for a man of his position to make these comments. ")

As usual, anyone who dares say anything negative about Islam or muzzies is a liar and Islam is, apparently, perfect and not in any need of greater scrutiny, self-regulation or adjustment.

Exchanges such as this on the "Official" level are helpful in that they remind those of us who are not political and culture-war junkies that intolerant Islam is very much a fact and remains a dire threat, despite the slavish pronouncements of it's apologists.