[redgirlinabluestate]

Oh boy, how lame. Style over substance. A hand stunt absolves everyone from their actual positions? You know your candidate sponsored a bill in the senate that made the following findings:

SEC. 1001. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON GLOBAL WARMING.

(a) FINDINGS. The Congress makes the following findings:

(1) Evidence continues to build that increases in atmospheric concentrations of man-made greenhouse gases are contributing to global climate change.

(2) The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has concluded that ``there is new and stronger evidence that most of the warming observed over the last 50 years is attributable to human activities'' and that the Earth's average temperature can be expected to rise between 2.5 and 10.4 degrees Fahrenheit in this century.
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1924826/posts?page=147

Isn't that your guy saying one thing and doing another or vice versa?

[Vision]

What’s more defining? A failed bill from 5 years ago and a candidate who is strongly against global warming now, or a candidate who says he is for and against it now?