Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lowbridge
Actually I kind of agree with him. He does have the right to lie as long as it is not intended to cause an official to take actions they shouldn’t.

But, whatever happened to shame and the public standards of behavior? By the same right of free speech, everyone should be able to call him “Scumbag” in public forums and on the street. He would have no right to object. Free speech and all that.
He should also be fired from the water board due to a public standard of not having lying scumbags on the board.
Finally, the public should tag him as a scumbag in their mind. Ostracizing and shame are effective examples for others.

9 posted on 01/05/2008 2:05:21 PM PST by IrishCatholic (No local communist or socialist party chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: IrishCatholic

This guy could cite Clinton as a precedent. Clinton lied and lied and lied and got away with it, why can’t he?


12 posted on 01/05/2008 2:13:22 PM PST by Old North State
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: IrishCatholic

Moral Indignation needs a major comeback.


18 posted on 01/05/2008 2:51:43 PM PST by The Spirit Of Allegiance (Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: IrishCatholic
Actually I kind of agree with him. He does have the right to lie as long as it is not intended to cause an official to take actions they shouldn’t.

I'd extend that to be "not intended to cause anyone to take actions they wouldn't take absent such claim."

33 posted on 01/05/2008 4:25:18 PM PST by supercat (Sony delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson