It’s a little early for burying Fred. But he needs to get out and endorse Hunter.
Hunter said he’d like to take third here in New Hampshire. If he doesn’t, it will be ‘goodbye Hunter.’
Yeah, because Hunter has a better chance than Fred. /sarc
What place did Mr. Hunter come in, in Iowa? I can’t remember.
pissant, sometimes you play the one string ukelele too much
.....nothin but love........
You know that is very funny statement. Unfortunately, you say it seriously.
“It’s a little early for burying Fred. But he needs to get out and endorse Hunter.”
Nah, its about time Romney, Huckster, McLame, and the Guido, get out and endorse Thompson.
How bout that.
Typical pissant logic!
You know, back when Huckabee was a second-tier no-hoper, I considered myself a nominal supporter of his. I didn’t think he had the slightest chance of winning, but my view was that it was too early to start strategizing and compromising and I might as well stick with a guy I really liked for as long as he was around.
About the time the “Huckaboom” took off, I wised up. Got off the Huck bandwagon at the same time a great many of my compatriots got on.
Anyway, the point is that I could actually see myself joining the Hunter camp with the same mindset I used to have as a Huck guy. But the bull-headed, fanaticism-tinged detachment from reality of his supporters turns me off.
Ok, WHY?
Why does Fred, who is in the top three, need to "endorse Hunter" who finished, what, 6th, 7th? Other than pipe dreams and delusion, just what is Duncan going to win? Even in WYOMING Fred is predicted ahead of Duncan.
So again, WHY? I want to hear this one.
what? you make zero sense...