OK, I'l type this really slowly so you can understand what I'm saying:
1) You in post 43:
I was thinking along the same lines. The man said he didn't want the job so why should I vote for him?2) When challenged on that claim, you started to defend it in posts 78 and 93:
78 And the point is -- Fred said that!2) In post 117, you post Fred's exact words:93 Thompson NEVER said any such thing.
Are you serious? Sure he did! He said that he wasn't particularly interested in becoming the POTUS at the townhall meetings in Iowa last week.
Dude! Don't get mad at me! The man actually said "I'm not particularly interested in running for president.3) You then somehow claim that this quote supports your original claim. (Another hint: It doesn't.)The question is: are you in denial or trying to rewrite history?
127 Everybody needs to stop trying to convince me what Fred "really" said. Either he made a BIG mistake which showed in the Iowa caucus or he was babbling. I'm not the only one who took his words literally...
You're not taking his words literally. Either you're misrepresenting them deliberately and disingenously or your reading comprehension is quite poor.
Thanks for assembling that. John123 lied, and that indictment has laid it all out.
********************
I'm going with option #1. No one could be that stupid.