Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Maker of Tainted Dog Food to Pay $3.1M
The Associated Press / Google News ^ | January 5, 2008 | By Meg Kinnard

Posted on 01/05/2008 6:02:30 AM PST by JACKRUSSELL

(COLUMBIA, S.C.) — A company that made contaminated pet food that killed dozens of dogs nationwide will pay $3.1 million in a settlement with pet owners, an attorney said Friday.

The pet food, which contained a mold called aflatoxin, was produced at Diamond Pet Foods' plant in South Carolina. The company will set up a fund to reimburse pet owners for the loss of their dog, veterinarian bills and the cost of any unreturned contaminated food, said attorney Jim Andrews, who represented a Knoxville, Tenn., family that sued the company.

Diamond Pet Foods, based in Meta, Mo., acknowledged that workers at its Gaston, S.C., plant failed to follow internal testing procedures to ensure its products were safe. The company made the acknowledgment after the Food and Drug Administration released a report showing the company has no record of test results for 12 shipments of corn in 2005, when grain tainted with the deadly fungus slipped into the plant.

The company contends it did nothing illegal, according to the settlement. An attorney for the company said Diamond would cooperate with claimants.

"Diamond's taken care of its customers since the very first day that they found out about this, and I think the settlement that we've entered into continues to do that," lawyer Jeffrey Thompson said from his office in Knoxville, Tenn.

Aflatoxin, a naturally occurring chemical that comes from a fungus sometimes found on corn and in other crops, can cause severe liver damage.

The contaminated pet food was sold in 23 states. Diamond recalled about 20 varieties of dog and cat food when a New York veterinarian said in December 2005 that she had linked a dog's death to the company's food. An estimated 350,000 bags of dog food were recalled, according to the settlement.

Both attorneys said Friday they did not know how many people were expected to file claims against the company. According to the settlement agreement, Diamond and its insurance company have already settled about 1,200 related claims for compensation ranging from the price of recalled food to veterinary bills and pet deaths.

The settlement states that owners of a dog that died as a result of eating the contaminated food could receive as much as $1,000. Owners could also be compensated with as much as $1,000 for testing and treatment for aflatoxin poisoning, as well as payment for as many as two bags of pet food.

Andrews and other attorneys representing the claimants will receive a fee of $465,000, which will be paid out from the $3.1 million, according to the settlement.

The 2005 recall is unrelated to the contamination problem that prompted recalls of more than 100 pet-food brands in early 2007. In that case, investigators traced pet deaths to a toxic chemical, melamine, that had been added during manufacturing in China.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; petfoodrecall

1 posted on 01/05/2008 6:02:32 AM PST by JACKRUSSELL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Duchess47; jahp; LilAngel; metmom; EggsAckley; Battle Axe; SweetCaroline; Grizzled Bear; ...
Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

(Please FReepmail me if you would like to be on or off of the list.)
2 posted on 01/05/2008 6:02:51 AM PST by JACKRUSSELL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JACKRUSSELL

I don’t think China was involved with this one.


3 posted on 01/05/2008 6:05:27 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JACKRUSSELL
The pet food, which contained a mold called aflatoxin

FWIW, aflatoxin is a toxin (poison) produced by Aspergillus flavus and some other molds, it is not itself a mold.

I know, it's a nit. But somebody needs to pick it.

4 posted on 01/05/2008 6:33:46 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy; JACKRUSSELL
Well, we could look at it like this...we hold OUR corps accountable. what about china? This settlement occurred as a result of tainted food in 2005..and the last sentence posted in the thread article states..

"...The 2005 recall is unrelated to the contamination problem that prompted recalls of more than 100 pet-food brands in early 2007. In that case, investigators traced pet deaths to a toxic chemical, melamine, that had been added during manufacturing in China. ..."

What will our govt/people do to china? nada?

5 posted on 01/05/2008 10:12:32 AM PST by Freedom2specul8 (Please pray for our troops.... http://anyservicemember.navy.mil/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
I know, it's a nit. But somebody needs to pick it.

Thank you. It was bugging me.

6 posted on 01/05/2008 10:17:10 AM PST by gitmo (From now on, ending a sentence with a preposition is something up with which I will not put.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gitmo

BTW, there are quite easy and inexpensive tests for aflatoxin that the company could have run. Their failure to do so is pretty much open and shut negligence.


7 posted on 01/05/2008 11:40:59 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson