Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mexican trucks defy Congress, still roll
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | January 5, 2008 | Jerome R. Corsi

Posted on 01/05/2008 4:44:15 AM PST by Man50D

A constitutional crisis is developing between Congress and the Department of Transportation over the federal government's decision to continue its project allowing Mexican trucks on U.S. roads, in defiance of new legislation. "The DOT response is both arrogant and wrong!" Sen. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D., wrote in a letter yesterday to Secretary of Transportation Mary Peters.

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration officials told the San Diego Union Tribune the cross-border Mexican truck demonstration project would continue because the program was established in September and the amendment allows programs that have already begun to continue.

But Dorgan insisted a provision in the 2008 omnibus spending bill was "clearly written and designed to put the brakes on the current pilot program."

"Failure to end the pilot program, I believe, will put the Department of Transportation in direct violation of federal law," the senator charged.

As WND reported in September, the amendment championed by Dorgan to remove funding for the project from the 2008 DOT appropriations bill passed the Senate by a bipartisan majority of 74-24.

(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 110th; aliens; illegalimmigration; invasion; mexicantrucks; mexico; nafta; trucking; voteseabiscuit; wheresthefence
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-126 next last

1 posted on 01/05/2008 4:44:17 AM PST by Man50D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Man50D
"The Bush administration is showing itself to be a rogue administration," Spencer said. "I understand the need to reduce the size of government, but I didn't realize it could involve doing away with the entire legislative branch. "It's outrageous and hypocritical for the Bush administration to be preaching democracy around the world, while blowing off democracy at home," he added.
BDS hysteria and hyperbole aside, I think congress is correct to demand that the DOT obey the law. And in this case, I agree with the law.
2 posted on 01/05/2008 4:47:38 AM PST by samtheman (Fred Thompson '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

I am sure all the terrorists, illegals, and drug dealers support the NAFTA/NAU/Mexico trucks deal.

The program should be stopped, now. The arrogance of the Bush Admin to value the rights of illegals, drug dealers, etc over the rights of American citizens


3 posted on 01/05/2008 4:59:52 AM PST by UCFRoadWarrior (Illegal Aliens are not "undocumented immigrants"....Are murderers "population control specialists"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

“BDS hysteria and hyperbole aside, “

While there is a certain amount of hyperbole there it is wrong for him to do that. A lot of what Congress does is also wrong.


4 posted on 01/05/2008 5:04:47 AM PST by driftdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Before the Mexicans trucks were allowed to come into USA so freely, 19 wheelers rarely crashed. Now there are several every day in Houston where we live and in L A where we used to live. I keep wondering if there is a connection. They caught an 18 wheeler this week that had illegals hidden behind the merchandise in the truck.


5 posted on 01/05/2008 5:04:55 AM PST by buffyt (Free Border Agents Ramos and Campean NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

So the Dems get their illegal aliens and the APPEARANCE
of trying to stop it, too.

Strategery? I think not.


6 posted on 01/05/2008 5:05:39 AM PST by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

I agree.

I am a free trader - so does this agreement allow U.S. trucks freedom in Mexico?


7 posted on 01/05/2008 5:21:49 AM PST by wewereright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
A lot of what Congress does is also wrong.

I'll see your "A lot" and raise you a "most"....

8 posted on 01/05/2008 5:23:04 AM PST by Thermalseeker (Debates? Those weren't no stinkin' debates!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: buffyt

500 trucks operating since September and you’re seeing a rash of truck accidents in Houston? Yet with all the opposition to this program, no reports of Mexican trucks being involved?


9 posted on 01/05/2008 5:30:44 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
500 trucks operating since September and you’re seeing a rash of truck accidents in Houston? Yet with all the opposition to this program, no reports of Mexican trucks being involved?

Of course, you would avoid the entire point of the article. Against the will of Congress and the people of the U.S. this administration is allowing foreign trucks into the U.S.

10 posted on 01/05/2008 5:34:57 AM PST by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wewereright

I am a free trader - so does this agreement allow U.S. trucks freedom in Mexico?
*************************************************
Officially , on paper , yes , however in reality as Mexico is a giant mafia town our truckers are unable to operate as they would be robbed blind... Cars and Trucks stolen in the US and taken into Mexico are not returned ,, in fact most of the Mexican police cars in border towns were stolen from US. There is a reason why your insurance policy doesn’t cover you if you drive into Mexico. In Mexico regular citizens are not allowed to own guns ,, our truckers are prohibited from carrying any weapon by the USDOT regs and would be unarmed against the criminal police forces of Mexico. In Laredo TX over 70 Americans have been kidnapped and brought into Mexico in recent times ,, many as sex toys for the drug lords who like blonds.


11 posted on 01/05/2008 5:37:19 AM PST by Neidermeyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
Of course, you would avoid the entire point of the article.

Maybe because I was responding to an individual comment? Just a thought.

12 posted on 01/05/2008 5:39:31 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: Man50D
I wonder what it benefits the DOT to defy the law? Why would anyone risk that unless there were some payoff somewhere in the "project". The DOT isn't a commercial entity, so why should it matter whether trucks come or go, except as a matter of law enforcement?

Someone's political, ergo financial, ox is getting gored and it's such a precious animal that they're not giving it up without a fight.

Follow the money.

-Joan

14 posted on 01/05/2008 5:40:23 AM PST by JoanVarga ("¿Por qué no te callas?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Not trying to be picky but the title seems to be misleading. The article states a conflict with the DOT and the Congress — not the Mexican truckers.


15 posted on 01/05/2008 5:43:29 AM PST by John123 ("What good fortune for the governments that the people do not think" -- Adolf Hitler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoanVarga

Of course, I realize that it’s a fantasy to state that a government department is not a commercial entity. It’s the most profitable business to be in. No overhead, great benefits and the perqs are for others to die for.


16 posted on 01/05/2008 5:47:02 AM PST by JoanVarga ("¿Por qué no te callas?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: buffyt

Most of the problems I’ve had lately with truckers consist of the “I don’t give a shit how your load got damaged” attitude by teamster drivers.


17 posted on 01/05/2008 5:47:09 AM PST by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
Of course, you would avoid the entire point of the article. Against the will of Congress and the people of the U.S. this administration is allowing foreign trucks into the U.S.

The poster is not avoiding the point of the article.

They are simply arguing the point of the other poster.

18 posted on 01/05/2008 5:49:34 AM PST by been_lurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

“Yet with all the opposition to this program, no reports of Mexican trucks being involved?”

There have been accidents, some have been reported. I for one do not trust the MSM to cover these types of things with full disclosure.

A couple of questions for you:

Do you propose that vehicles in Mexico are maintained to the same standard as those in the US?

Do you think its a good idea for large trucks to be allowed entry to any part of the US from Mexico with virtually no inspections or limitations?

Are you aware of the massive drug problem that exists within the US caused by drugs smuggled in/from/thru Mexico?

What is the problem the DOT and Bush are trying to solve with this program?


19 posted on 01/05/2008 5:57:39 AM PST by driftdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
Mexican trucks have been entering the U.S. since the early 1980's, and operating withing twenty miles of the border. With that in mind, your answers:

1. yes
2. no
3. yes
4. having to trans-ship goods from one carrier to another

20 posted on 01/05/2008 6:02:18 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-126 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson