Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JohnHuang2
Seems like all election "analysis" starts with an assumption: "Candidate x is losing because s/he is doing something wrong." The corollary is that if candidate x did everything right, s/he would be winning.

I believe that's wrong. Some candidates just aren't marketable. Hillary may be one of those people who, the more voters see of her, the less they like her. You can be handed a NY Senate seat by hiding the candidate but not the Presidency. For some, there's no winning strategy.

30 posted on 01/05/2008 6:30:43 AM PST by Dilbert56 (Harry Reid, D-Nev.: "We're going to pick up Senate seats as a result of this war.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Dilbert56

Good analysis. There are intangibles that simply cannot be packaged. If I were confident in a 100% fair election, I’d be wholly unconcerned about the prospect of President Hillary. Unfortunately, I’m not.


32 posted on 01/05/2008 6:55:22 AM PST by Eroteme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson