Is it because of her baggage (everything from whitewater, to filegate to travelgate to pardons of terrorists to stealing White House silverware, and etc) makes her less competative in the general election?
Or, is her Clintonian strategy of triangulation catching up with her (to many sides of each issue.)?
Or, could it be her tone? You know, her constant name-calling and Stalinist calls for investigations. Could her negativity be a negative among Dems?
Could it be that they (the Dems) don't believe her either?
Could it be her impeached and disbarred (once and alleged) husband gives them the creeps, too?
Or, could it be the Arkancide allegations? (like, who's next?)
I do think it's a little refreshing that the Dems don't just obediently fall into line. (Even though B. Hussein Obama is a bedrock socialist, and is no better of an alternative.)
She’s simply abhorent. Don’t over complicate it.....heheeee..
The LIE was exposed!
Bill was the "First Black President", but he's a Rich-White-Man!
Hillary spoke in Black-Southern-Accent last year, but she's a botoxed "Rich-White-PostMenopaused-Old-Lady!"
They got away with this stupid Hitler/Goebbles twisted truth for YEARS!
But, then comes along Obama,
A REAL Black Man!
WE ARE FREE AT LAST!!!!!!!!!!!
She wanted to create a Woodstock Museum costing a million dollars. What other reason does a Democrat need?
|
I think it's a bit like say, Detroit basketball fans and Bill Laimbeer. If anyone attacked Bill Laimbeer, they would defend him to their dying breath. And if they had to pick a basketball team with the hopes of winning a championship, he wouldn't be anywhere on it.