Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 2harddrive
So, we are talking about a half hour of speaking to people in public, from a position on public property.

Speaking to people in public? The facts of the case state shouting at the man's son, following the man away from the property and back to the property, and further shouting even when officers arrived.

Freedom of speech does not induce a requirement to listen. This was outright harassment.

31 posted on 01/04/2008 6:49:13 PM PST by kingu (Fred08 - The Constitution is the value I'm voting for. What value are you voting for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: kingu

Well, the baby killer’s son WAS out in public. (He could not have been legally nude then, could he?) No, he did not have to listen, and could have gone inside. The 2 ladies did apologize when they realized their identification error. Still, if is saves ONE baby’s life,...isn’t it worth it?


43 posted on 01/04/2008 7:37:13 PM PST by 2harddrive (...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson