Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Spktyr

This has always been Dominos policy... a policy that any wise driver will ignore.

Dominos CORP makes its decisions based on insurance premiums and liability lawsuit avoidance, not on the safety of its employees. The people making the calls are not the ones dealing with little miscreants with no respect for life coming after them.


25 posted on 01/04/2008 1:47:32 PM PST by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: HamiltonJay
Dominos CORP makes its decisions based on insurance premiums and liability lawsuit avoidance, not on the safety of its employees. The people making the calls are not the ones dealing with little miscreants with no respect for life coming after them.

The solution would be legislation that makes clear that:

  1. A company shall not be liable for any crime an employee commits with a gun, unless the company either (1) undertook some affirmative action toward arming the employee, or (2) required such armament as a condition of employment.
  2. Any widely-known action by a company to disarm employees or customers shall expose the company to liability for any harm that befalls such employees or customers if such harm is found to be a foreseeable consequence of such disarmament.
If a company still wants to require disarmament as a condition of employment, that's fine. But unless the company has other means in place to provide security, it could get expensive.
74 posted on 01/04/2008 5:07:36 PM PST by supercat (Sony delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson