Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CounterCounterCulture
Frankly, when there are 9 or 10 candidates on a stage, debates get really silly. And they aren't really debates anyway when there are only 3 or 4 people.

If each candidate gets only 3-4 minutes of speaking time in an hour (as opposed to the host -- I won't even call them the mod-word -- who gets 20-30 minutes), it isn't worth going to or watching.

I'd rather see a series of debates with 3 or 4 candidates, selected randomly for fairness, if necessary, and have a real debate or at least a real discussion, and fewer sound bites and hand-raising polls.

49 posted on 01/04/2008 10:34:52 AM PST by Tanniker Smith (wee fish ewe a mare egrets moose panda hippo gnu deer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tanniker Smith

With all the credibility given for mythical “electability”, I would be happy to see some debates between republicans and democrats before we have a nominee.

As things stand now they all claim to be the electable candidate but for all we know they’ll turn into pudding when faced with a real democrat. And then it’s just too late.

After the CNN sneak attacks, Duncan Hunter sent a letter to the Clinton campaign inviting her to send more. That’s not a man afraid of facing a tough fight.


63 posted on 01/04/2008 10:46:59 AM PST by cripplecreek (Only one consistent conservative in this race and his name is Hunter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson