I suggest you contact a legal firm in Lousiana and have them go to the courthouse and get the transcripts.
As for your ‘ranting’ about the IRS’s previous victories, that was already explained to you. The people they targeted were no match for their tactics.
Surely there are tax cheats but there are also those that stand on principles. Usually when a person stands on principles and has a case, the IRS folds before trial claiming a ‘technical problem’ which is code for them not having a case. Therefore, the stronger cases never see court whereas the weak ones are used to pass on the image of the IRS being tough on tax cheats.
But in the Cryer case the IRS did not fold but lost at trial.
I notice you did not volunteer that you were going to stop paying taxes, too. If not, why (seeing as how you believe everything that one side — Cryer — has posted)?