Really?
Who cares if I was around for that.
What I said was that you can't provide a single cite. And, of course, you still have failed to do so.
Not only haven't you provided anything yet, you never will, because it doesn't exist.
Since you think you are so smart
Well, I'm pretty obviously quite a lot smarter than you are, or, at the very least, more knowledgable about the state of federal tax law and how the idiotic Cryer interacted with it.
maybe you can point to the law that requires individual who exchange their efforts for compensation are required to pay taxes on that money. Good luck.
Perhaps you, in your abysmal, concrete-like ignorance, should look a few posts above, where it was conclusively demonstrated to the last idiot who said "show me the law" that the law requires anyone who receives "compensation" to pay taxes on that money.
Got any more stupid questions or statements? I can't wait for your next gem.
Check out tis link and read his 109 page memorandum. I have, and he makes a very sound argumant.
http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2007/07/lawyertax-prote.html
It’s been almost six months since Cryer was acquitted.
I can’t find anything on the net indicating that the IRS is trying to collect taxes from Cryer. Why do you think they have not taken action yet if Cryer owes the taxes? Could it be that they are unwilling to risk a civil action to collect? As you must know, any action to collect now would result in a decision at the trial or appellate court level that would be far worse than just ‘forgetting’ about Cryer. Once the matter would be decided by a federal appeals court, the flood gates would open.
It’s been almost six months since Cryer was acquitted.
I can’t find anything on the net indicating that the IRS is trying to collect taxes from Cryer. Why do you think they have not taken action yet if Cryer owes the taxes? Could it be that they are unwilling to risk a civil action to collect? As you must know, any action to collect now would result in a decision at the trial or appellate court level that would be far worse than just ‘forgetting’ about Cryer. Once the matter would be decided by a federal appeals court, the flood gates would open.