I agree w/you...what's surprising, tho, is that we never saw these kinds of things posted in thread & thread when Huck wasn't perceived as a "threat." (That wasn't true, BTW, of Romney).
So I take that to mean that if he was the level of threat folks now make him out to be, then we'd seen that level of animosity all throughout '07. (But we didn't in FReeper posts).
Conclusion: Basically, it seems that it's not Huck's bad side on the issues that motivated many folks as much as that he threatened their fave candidate's voter turf. Now that's not true of some FReeper's, who have been issuing Huck warnings all throughout '07. (So I'm not talking about those folks). I'm only talking about those that if you review their comments for the past two months, you'll see they went from 0 to 150 MPH just like a snap of their fingers.
“Conclusion: Basically, it seems that it’s not Huck’s bad side on the issues that motivated many folks as much as that he threatened their fave candidate’s voter turf. Now that’s not true of some FReeper’s, who have been issuing Huck warnings all throughout ‘07. (So I’m not talking about those folks). I’m only talking about those that if you review their comments for the past two months, you’ll see they went from 0 to 150 MPH just like a snap of their fingers.”
Very well said.
That’s a pretty astute observation.