To: dan1123
I agree Duncan Hunter has the strongest record when it comes to illegal aliens. However, IMO Thompson and Romney are "seeing the light." I would be so happy if either Hunter or Thompson would win.
Huckabee is far worse than Mitt and about equal with Rudy and McCain. Huckabee/Rudy/McCain are now the only ones who are truly pro illegal aliens, amnesty, and oppose a fence. Huckabee would be the easiest for any Democrat to defeat. This is why MSM is pushing him - even The New York Times.
304 posted on
01/03/2008 2:46:40 PM PST by
Dante3
To: Dante3
IMO Thompson and Romney are "seeing the light." I would be so happy if either Hunter or Thompson would win.
I'm sorry but I just don't trust that either of them have "seen the light" anymore than Huckabee has. What I see here is no action on the part of either Mitt or Thompson on handling illegal immigration when they held office, and a few campaign promises now. Hunter put through and got legislation passed for a border fence. He got one built in San Diego. Mitt and Thompson allowed illegal immigration to go on unchallenged. So Mitt and Fred promise to build a fence--so does Huckabee. I don't believe Huckabee is unelectable because of his skills in communication. Huckabee shines when Fred pauses and Mitt stumbles. Hunter does an amazing job when the press lets him speak.
Why is everyone giving Fred and Mitt a pass and jumping on Huckabee when there is just as much reason to jump on Fred and Mitt from the objections I have seen raised. All three should be looked on very cautiously.
322 posted on
01/03/2008 2:56:28 PM PST by
dan1123
(You are to be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect. --Jesus)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson