To: romanesq
is 3rd good for fred,
but 3rd for hillary, bad?
1,334 posted on
01/03/2008 6:15:33 PM PST by
ken21
( people die + you never hear from them again.)
To: ken21
“is 3rd good for fred,
but 3rd for hillary, bad?
Yes
1,355 posted on
01/03/2008 6:17:08 PM PST by
Sunnyflorida
(Drill in the Gulf of Mexico/Anwar, etc and we can join OPEC!!!)
To: ken21
Yes. Hillary was the anointed one. 3rd is bad.
Fred has been ignored or scorned by the press.
It was always rudymcromney and add huskster of late.
A 3rd for Fred is great!
The MSM cannot ignore him.
1,377 posted on
01/03/2008 6:18:48 PM PST by
Jet Jaguar
(Who would the terrorists vote for?)
To: ken21
Because Hillary was suppose to be “inevitably” the Democrat choice suddenly looks vulnerable. Meanwhile, Fred, the candidate who was suppose to be getting out of the race after Iowa according to the talking heads, proves to have surprising strength
1,446 posted on
01/03/2008 6:23:47 PM PST by
MNJohnnie
(Hillary Clinton has never done one thing right. She thinks that qualifies her to be President?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson