[Lexinom]

Well, and he is for the Human Life Amendment. Many seem to think a policy that has killed 49,000,000 Americans is just a minor, peripherial issue. For many of us, it is not. Damn, I would certainly hope not! 49,000,000 lives taken, and not gently and with anesthesia as with a capital felons! For me, if ending abortion meant living in a small flat, eating less, driving a small car, any sacrifice, it would be worth it. My life and my pleasures are not worth more that any one else's life.

Flame away if you must. I am not budging on this, and God have mercy on me if I ever waver.

[Ronaldus Magnus]

"For me, if ending abortion meant living in a small flat, eating less, driving a small car, any sacrifice, it would be worth it. My life and my pleasures are not worth more that any one else's life."

Well put. Ending the horror which has allowed the deliberate murder of 49,000,000 innocent Americans matters above all else.

[RockinRight]

But the HLA won’t pass.

Thompson’s stance will be more effective - working the Supreme Court angle, since they got us into this mess in the first place.

Sometimes, you have to take what sounds less appealing but is more effective over the one that ‘seems’ morally ‘correct’ on the surface.

It’s the net result that counts.

[TN4Liberty]

Well, and he (Huck) is for the Human Life Amendment.

So we would get a candidate who is no more pro-life than several others because he supports an amendment that he cannot pass, cannot introduce, cannot sign. You do understand that the President doesn't have a role in amending the Constitution, don't you? Talk about style over substance!