It’s a matter of willingness to fight. The KLA wants the territory, Serbia believes that Kosovo is it’s cultural heartland. The European soldiers don’t have a reason to fight nor do they for the most part have actual combat experience as the other parties do. It’s not a matter of them being European, it’s a matter of motivation.
Also, as regards air superiority, this did the US no good until civilian targets were bombed. Would the European public support bombing civilian targets to help the Albanian mafia? I’d appreciate your thoughts on this.
If Euroweenies support bombing Serbia again, then they better start bombing France.
I don’t see any big difference between Muzzie invaders snatching a province of Serbia and Muzzies snatching a few suburbs of Paris.
The precedent of “You Snatch It You Keep It” has already been made. A second attack on Serbia will codify it in international relations.
And Bush is either an idiot or a partner with the Clintons.
sorry but what do you mean by “it´s a matter of willingness to fight? do your soldiers have a special willingness to fight in iraq for example? and if so what for they are willing to fight? this are professional soldiers. it´s their job to fullfill their duty in several parts of this world. so i don´t think it´s a question of willingness or not. it´s their job. no one forced them to join the military. and for combat experience. i guess before the iraq and afgansitan war started most of your troops did not have combat experience too. but still they did not preform bad. or did they? and NO european public would not support bombing civilan targets. but why should europe bomb targets in kosovo or serbia. the troops are allready there. the other side would have to attack our troops. not the other way around. and serbian air force for example is no match for a combinded european army.