Apparently, Dawkins doesn't know the definition for the word 'altruism.'
Maybe we can send him a dictionary to help him out.
“Apparently, Dawkins doesn’t know the definition for the word ‘altruism.’”
I would say that Dawkins has decided, as many philosophers have argued, that there is no such thing as “altruism” - that it’s all just self-interest. I do things for the good of strangers because it makes me feel good. That argument actually rings somewhat true to me.